What’s the risk if the starting value of the pension isn’t correct?
If the fund’s asset values are understated, your client may have more money generating tax exempt investment income than the transfer balance cap would normally allow. Their minimum pension amount may also be understated. If the ATO thinks your client hasn’t drawn enough pension to meet the (correct) minimum amount, the tax exemption on the fund’s investment income could be denied.
Conversely, if the fund’s asset values are overstated, your client may use up more than needed of their transfer balance cap and may be drawing more pension out of the fund than necessary.
Are the rules any different for transition to retirement income streams (TRIS)?
Yes and no. Certainly, the issues regarding the calculation of the minimum pension amount are still relevant for a TRIS but the trustee also needs to be careful that the maximum pension amount isn’t overstated. The issues relating to the transfer balance cap and the tax exemption on the fund’s investment income won’t be relevant until the TRIS becomes a retirement phase pension (eg on the member’s 65th birthday, when they notify the trustee of their retirement). Where accountants/advisers have SMSF clients drawing TRISs, looking ahead to when the pension might become a retirement phase pension (ie when there is likely to be a trigger event), will help alert clients to when updated asset valuations may be needed.
Starting pensions and want to learn more about the issues to consider? Check out our Bite – Practical tips and traps when starting pensions. Available with a subscription to Education Bites. More info is available here.